![]() Finally, I reapplied the javascript update and published changes again to see if it was substantially faster. I then deleted the change, updated the site again, then applied the update. I tested this claim out on my wife’s site by inserting some custom javascript for her blog page and then publishing the changes with the previous version of RW (this forced an update on 140 files for her site). While this is a relatively modest update, the developers claim that upload speed is now significantly enhanced. Not free like WordPress blog commenting is handled by HaloScan, so it’s not well-integrated with the app many third-party plugins are relatively expensive some paid plugins seem like they should be core features occasional quirky and/or buggy behavior loading up a large site is slow publishing a large site is still a bit slow and occasionally doesn’t work (see next paragraph) some of the site customization/configurability options are not very obvious or well-explained not easy to mix and match dynamic/static content on a page doesn’t integrate with MarsEdit for blogging Latest Update: Great themes from RW and third-party developers customization options are outstanding for most themes dedicated user base great forums and customer support outstanding third-party add-ons easy to modify a site for beginners frequent updates and improvements Snippets library makes it easy to drag and drop bits of often-used code Con: It’s used by experienced developers, too, because it’s a handy way to quickly build and deploy a site with minimal fuss, and it’s fairly easy to create custom templates. As a content management tool, the built-in capabilities of this app are easy to use and the user interface is much friendlier than most other web-based content management systems. ![]() It’s a stand-alone, client-side web design tool. RapidWeaver targets people with little to no web design experience seeking a simple way to produce a professional-looking, standards-compliant, and highly customizable mixed-content website. RapidWeaver | Developer’s site | full review To get the most out of this, I recommend you start by reviewing the other entries in this series. ![]() So I hope to place both tools in context to help you make a better-informed decision. And for bloggers and those who want to blog, WordPress is known to be a widely popular and flexible choice. Still, I maintain that this is a handy comparison, mainly because RW is more than capable as a blogging platform - and it seems to be gaining in popularity for Mac users. And in terms of usage, RW attempts to be an all-inclusive website creation tool while WP specializes in blogging and dynamic content management. In terms of the platform, RW is a Mac-only application that is tied to the desktop, while WP is a free roaming, web-based platform comfortable on a variety of operating systems. ![]() I’ve now spent a few days with these new versions, so I’ll recap what’s new and provide my impressions here.Īs I’ve worked on this comparison, it’s become even more apparent how different the two tools are: in terms of user base, RW is a flea to the WP gorilla. I would have posted this sooner if not for the recent releases of WordPress 2.5 and RapidWeaver 3.6.6. This is the final installment in a four part comparison of Realmac’s RapidWeaver and WordPress, two popular web publishing choices for the Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |